view mod_map/README.markdown @ 4515:2e33eeafe962

mod_muc_markers: Prevent any markers from reaching the archive, even if untracked Original intention was to leave alone things that this module isn't handling. However markers in archives are just problematic without more advanced logic about what is markable and what is not. It also requires a more advanced query in mod_muc_rai to determine the latest markable message instead of the latest archived message. I'd rather keep the "is archivable" and "is markable" definition the same for simplicity. I don't want to introduce yet another set of rules for no reason. No markers in MAM.
author Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com>
date Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:55:02 +0000
parents d31fa28d9482
children
line wrap: on
line source

---
labels:
- 'Stage-Experimental'
summary: Prototype MAM summary
---

This is a prototype for an experimental archive summary API recently
added in [Prosody trunk](https://hg.prosody.im/trunk/rev/2c5546cc5c70).

# Protocol

::: {.alert .alert-danger}
This is not a finished protocol, but a prototype meant for testing.
:::

A basic query:

``` {.xml}
<iq id="lx7" type="get">
  <summary xmlns="xmpp:prosody.im/mod_map"/>
</iq>
```

Answered like:

``` {.xml}
<iq type="result" id="lx7">
  <summary xmlns="xmpp:prosody.im/mod_map">
    <item jid="juliet@capulet.lit">
      <count>3</count>
      <start>2019-02-25T15:48:00+0100</start>
      <end>2019-08-23T01:39:50+02:00</end>
      <body>O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?</body>
    </item>
  </summary>
</iq>
```

It can also take dataform and RSM parameters similar to a [filtered MAM
query](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0313.html#filter).

E.g if the last message you received had an id `09af3-cc343-b409f` then
the following query would tell you who sent you messages since:

``` {.xml}
<iq id="lx8" type="get">
  <summary xmlns="xmpp:prosody.im/mod_map">
    <set xmlns="http://jabber.org/protocol/rsm">
      <max>10</max>
      <after>09af3-cc343-b409f</after>
    </set>
  </summary>
</iq>
```