view mod_firewall/scripts/spam-blocklists.pfw @ 5682:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parents d84757f9adcb
children
line wrap: on
line source

# This script depends on spam-blocking.pfw also being loaded
# Any traffic that is not explicitly blocked or allowed by other
# rules will be checked against the JabberSPAM server blocklist

%LIST blocklist: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/jabberspam/blacklist/blacklist.txt

::user/spam_handle_unknown_custom

CHECK LIST: blocklist contains $<@from|host>
BOUNCE=policy-violation (Your server is blocked due to spam)

::user/spam_check_muc_invite_custom

# Check the server we received the invitation from
CHECK LIST: blocklist contains $<@from|host>
BOUNCE=policy-violation (Your server is blocked due to spam)

# Check the inviter's JID against the blocklist, too
CHECK LIST: blocklist contains $<{http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user}x/invite@from|host>
BOUNCE=policy-violation (Your server is blocked due to spam)