view mod_http_dir_listing2/resources/style.css @ 5682:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parents 1108a40c3118
children
line wrap: on
line source


body{background-color:#eeeeec;font-family:sans-serif;}
h1{font-size:xx-large;}
a:link,a:visited{color:#2e3436;text-decoration:none;}
a:link:hover,a:visited:hover{color:#3465a4;}
.filelist{background-color:white;padding:1em;list-style-position:inside;-moz-column-width:20em;-webkit-column-width:20em;-ms-column-width:20em;column-width:20em;}
.file{list-style-image:url(text-x-generic.png);}
.directory{list-style-image:url(folder.png);}
.parent{list-style-image:url(user-home.png);}
footer{margin-top:1ex;font-size:smaller;color:#babdb6;}