Mercurial > prosody-modules
view mod_jsxc/templates/template.html @ 5682:527c747711f3
mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode
RFC 7009 section 2.1 states:
> The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in
> case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was
> issued to the client making the revocation request. If this
> validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of
> the error by the authorization server as described below.
The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later
part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af
It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be
allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible
thing to do.
author | Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100 |
parents | 3a5fbb6c61b3 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> {header_style# <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" href="{item}"/>} {header_scripts# <script charset="utf-8" src="{item}"></script>} <title>{service_name?Prosody IM and JSXC}</title> {header_tags# {item!}} </head> <body> <form id="jsxc_login_form" action="javascript:"> <dl> <dt><label for="jsxc_username">Username</label></dt> <dd><input id="jsxc_username" name="username" placeholder="Alice"/></dd> <dt><label for="jsxc_password">Password</label></dt> <dd><input id="jsxc_password" name="password" type="password"/></dd> </dl> <button type="submit">Login</button> </form> <script>{jsxcjs.startup.script!}</script> </body> </html>