view mod_muc_reserve_nick_pattern/mod_muc_reserve_nick_pattern.lua @ 5682:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parents dc6a10629670
children
line wrap: on
line source

local jid = require "util.jid";
local st = require "util.stanza";

local nick_patterns = module:get_option_array("muc_reserve_nick_patterns", {});

module:hook("muc-occupant-pre-join", function (event)
	local nick = jid.resource(event.occupant.nick);
	for k, nick_pattern in pairs(nick_patterns) do
		if nick:match(nick_pattern) then
			local reply = st.error_reply(event.stanza, "modify", "conflict", "Unacceptable nickname, please try another");
			module:send(reply);
			return true;
		end
	end
end);