view mod_muc_restrict_avatars/mod_muc_restrict_avatars.lua @ 5682:527c747711f3

mod_http_oauth2: Limit revocation to clients own tokens in strict mode RFC 7009 section 2.1 states: > The authorization server first validates the client credentials (in > case of a confidential client) and then verifies whether the token was > issued to the client making the revocation request. If this > validation fails, the request is refused and the client is informed of > the error by the authorization server as described below. The first part was already covered (in strict mode). This adds the later part using the hash of client_id recorded in 0860497152af It still seems weird to me that revoking a leaked token should not be allowed whoever might have discovered it, as that seems the responsible thing to do.
author Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
date Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:30:49 +0100
parents 2c69577b28c2
children 66e7d46b1d4b
line wrap: on
line source

local bare_jid = require"util.jid".bare;
local mod_muc = module:depends("muc");

local function filter_avatar_advertisement(tag)
	if tag.attr.xmlns == "vcard-temp:x:update" then
		return nil;
	end

	return tag;
end

module:hook("presence/full", function(event)
	local stanza = event.stanza;
	local room = mod_muc.get_room_from_jid(bare_jid(stanza.attr.to));

	if not room:get_affiliation(stanza.attr.from) then
		stanza:maptags(filter_avatar_advertisement);
	end
end, 1);